Applicants commonly cite the “high salary or other significantly high remuneration” criterion, which is relatively straightforward. While a high salary may not carry as much weight as other criteria, such as a critical role or original contributions, it can serve as strong supporting evidence. It reflects how your contributions are valued within your field. Generally, compensation is often tied to your impact on your industry, and USCIS is open to considering this as proof of your extraordinary ability.
Although the impact of this criterion may not be as substantial as others, the evidence is usually consistent from one petition to another and is often readily available. Therefore, if you are well-compensated, this can be an effective way to strengthen your petition. Additionally, USCIS is accustomed to the types of evidence presented for this category since most professionals receive similar compensation, regardless of their location.
To determine if you meet this criterion, start by comparing your compensation to that of professionals at your level of expertise within the same or a similar field. If you consistently earn more than your peers, you likely have a strong case for meeting this criterion.
However, it’s essential to prove that your salary or other forms of remuneration are significantly higher than those of others in your field. You can approach this by providing geographical comparisons, showing that you are paid more than others in your region, or by comparing your salary to professionals across the United States or your home country for nonimmigrants. Typically, your evidence will be based on available statistics from the region where you work (or, if you are in a foreign country, from your area of employment).
USCIS officers may ask questions such as:
To satisfy this criterion, you need to prepare two types of evidence carefully:
In some cases, only a few pieces of evidence may be sufficient. In others, you might need to provide more comprehensive documentation to clearly demonstrate your accomplishments. Each EB-1A applicant is unique, and your approach to gathering and presenting evidence should be tailored to your individual case.
By thoughtfully preparing your evidence and clearly presenting your case, you can strengthen your argument that you meet the high salary or other significantly high remuneration criterion for the EB-1A visa. To learn more about what USCIS is looking for and to determine whether you meet other criteria, kindly visit here.
Understanding the processing times for EB2-NIW (National Interest Waiver) and EB-1A (Extraordinary Ability) visas is crucial for applicants aspiring to obtain these U.S. employment-based preference visas.
Explore the differences between the O-1A and EB-1A visas for talented individuals immigrating to the US. Learn about the temporary, sponsored O-1A visa versus the permanent, self-petitioning EB-1A option. Gain clarity on which visa aligns best with your goals.
Understanding whether you qualify for the EB-1A visa can be challenging, particularly when assessing if you have played a leading or critical role in a distinguished organization. This blog post aims to provide you with clear tools and insights to help evaluate and demonstrate your eligibility under this specific criterion, ensuring you present a compelling case to USCIS adjudicators.
The goal of this post is to help you assess whether you can argue that you meet the second of the ten EB-1A criteria: holding a membership in an association that demands outstanding achievement from its members.